Addressing Climate Change means socialism and eugenics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Addressing Climate Change means socialism and eugenics

    According to 11,000 scientists:

    https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/po...150004993.html

    The scientists make specific calls for policymakers to quickly implement systemic change to energy, food, and economic policies. But they go one step further, into the politically fraught territory of population control. It “must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity,” they write.
    Basically, we need Chinese Communist-style government over our daily lives. That's what they're telling us is needed to address Climate Change.

    The report, however, comes one day after U.S. President Donald Trump began the formal procedure of withdrawing America from the Paris climate accord.

  • #2
    invited by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to serve as Expert Reviewer of its next Assessment Report, I feel an obligation to apologize for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public.
    Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction”
    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said “The world is going to end in twelve years if we don’t address climate change.” Britain’s most high-profile environmental group claimed “Climate Change Kills Children.”

    The world’s most influential green journalist, Bill McKibben, called climate change the “greatest challenge humans have ever faced” and said it would “wipe out civilizations.”

    Mainstream journalists reported, repeatedly, that the Amazon was “the lungs of the world,” and that deforestation was like a nuclear bomb going off.

    As a result, half of the people surveyed around the world last year said they thought climate change would make humanity extinct. And in January, one out of five British children told pollsters they were having nightmares about climate change.
    Why were we all so misled?
    Groups motivated by anti-humanist beliefs forced the World Bank to stop trying to end poverty and instead make poverty “sustainable.”
    The ideology behind environmental alarmsim — Malthusianism — has been repeatedly debunked for 200 years and yet is more powerful than ever.
    The evidence is overwhelming that our high-energy civilization is better for people and nature than the low-energy civilization that climate alarmists would return us to.
    I hope he wakes a lot of people up because he's one of the best qualified people out there who can really change minds.
    Climate change is real, but it’s not the end of the world. It’s not even our most important environmental problem.

    Comment

    Working...
    X