We need a military coup against Trump

[LoneHorseman]

You are very correct on Tucker's influence Don. I remember Tucker as a little bow tie wearing mouthpiece for the republicans, working as an opinion journalist at cnn 25 or so years ago. Always parroted the party line, where his ideological partner at cnn, Pat Buchanan was always more independent and more rebellious towards his party, by taking different views, especially on foreign policy and in particular against ISRAEL and if you do that in Washington, you're going to be a pariah. Tucker always respected Buchanan and a lot of Tucker's views today on foreign policy, immigration and social policies, imo, was because of Buchanan's influence. And Buchanan's views back then on immigration, foreign policy, on tariffs, especially on China, have been proved mostly if not all correct 25 or 30 years later.

[Don Giovanni]

The real reasons to impeach Trump:

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arch...al-violations/

In April, 2018, President Trump fired 100 Tomahawk missiles into Syria allegedly as punishment for a Syrian government chemical attack in Douma. Though the US was not under imminent threat of attack from Syria, Trump didn’t wait for a Congressional declaration of war on Syria or even an authorization for a missile strike. In fact, he didn’t even wait for an investigation of the event to find out what actually happened! He just decided to send a hundred missiles – at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars – into Syria.

We are now finding out from whistleblowers on the UN team that investigated the alleged attack that the report blaming the Syrian government was falsified and that the whole “attack” was nothing but a false flag operation.

Last month, President Trump authorized the assassination of a top Iranian General, Qassim Soleimani, and a top Iraqi military officer inside Iraqi territory while Soleimani was on a diplomatic mission. Trump and his Administration tried to claim that the attack was essential because of an “imminent threat” of a Soleimani attack on US troops in the region.

We found out shortly afterward that they lied about the “imminent threat.” The assassination was not “urgent” – it was planned back in June. Trump then claimed it didn’t matter whether there was an imminent threat: Soleimani was a bad guy so he deserved to be assassinated.

But the attack was an act of war on Iran without Congressional declaration or authorization for war. Is that not perhaps a “high crime” or “misdemeanor”?

We are finding out that, contrary to Trump claims, Soleimani was not even behind the December attack on US troops in Iraq. New evidence suggests it was actually an ISIS operation attempting to goad the US into moving against Iraq’s Shia militias.

Democrats won’t move against Trump for what may be real “high crimes” and “misdemeanors” because they support his overseas aggression. They just wish they were the ones pulling the trigger.

I wish this man, Dr. Ron Paul, were president instead.

[Don Giovanni]

https://www.chron.com/news/article/T...d-15553997.php

Mattis quietly went to Washington National Cathedral to pray about his concern for the nation's fate under Trump's command and, according to Woodward, told Coats, "There may come a time when we have to take collective action" since Trump is "dangerous. He's unfit."

(emphasis mine)

[Don Giovanni]

Bob Woodward first reported in 2018 that Trump was pursuing it.

At the time Trump had vehemently denied it: “No, that was never even contemplated, nor would it be contemplated and it should not have been written about in the book,” he had previously stated.

But Trump casually described Tuesday that in fact he was seriously considering it, only to be stopped by his Secretary of Defense at the time, Marine general Jim Mattis, which Trump added "was a highly overrated general".

Thank God for Mattis.